🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of nations are exploring parallel measures.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our kids' childhood". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an similar ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a bill increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended parents to block their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a good starting point," commented the MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Instead, the government pledged to further research the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization founded by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the regional government level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law capping teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from certain figures to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of the West, further nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this global conversation evolves, the policies of Australia and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are less and less content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.